<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Why the rush for GS1 standards?”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rxtrace.com/2010/01/why-the-rush-for-gs1-standards.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rxtrace.com/2010/01/why-the-rush-for-gs1-standards.html/</link>
	<description>A comprehensive exploration of the intersection between the pharmaceutical supply chain, track and trace technology, standards and regulatory compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:02:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention “Why the rush for GS1 standards?” -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.rxtrace.com/2010/01/why-the-rush-for-gs1-standards.html/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention “Why the rush for GS1 standards?” -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rxtrace.com/?p=61#comment-347</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason (JT) Thompson, Jason (JT) Thompson. Jason (JT) Thompson said: Why the rush for GS1 standards? http://bit.ly/9LSRQU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason (JT) Thompson, Jason (JT) Thompson. Jason (JT) Thompson said: Why the rush for GS1 standards? <a href="http://bit.ly/9LSRQU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9LSRQU</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://www.rxtrace.com/2010/01/why-the-rush-for-gs1-standards.html/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rxtrace.com/?p=61#comment-48</guid>
		<description>The January/Februay issue of Journal of Healthcare Contracting has an article that covers this issue.  Readers may be interested in reading it at: 
http://www.jhconline.com/jan2010digital.asp

Dirk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The January/Februay issue of Journal of Healthcare Contracting has an article that covers this issue.  Readers may be interested in reading it at:<br />
<a href="http://www.jhconline.com/jan2010digital.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.jhconline.com/jan2010digital.asp</a></p>
<p>Dirk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted almon</title>
		<link>http://www.rxtrace.com/2010/01/why-the-rush-for-gs1-standards.html/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>ted almon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rxtrace.com/?p=61#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dirk for a thoughtful and rational piece on this issue and a fair treatment of my concerns.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, as a business issue I don&#039;t really have a dog in this fight as we deal with both standards families now.  I was raising the issue, as you are to promote a more critical look at &quot;efficiency&quot; which is not only what will be the most convenient solution, but also considers the cost to implement that option. In either case choosing a single set when two are now in widespread use will be an expensive conversion.  Is it worth it?
A few other clarifications:  I think both standards are truly global so this issue is a red herring, and I don&#039;t feel qualified to comment on the value of GS-1 &quot;inter-industry&quot; advantage, but I do notice when shopping retail at Barnes and Noble that books have their own standard (ISBN). I also think that cost is a big deal, and an integral part of determining what is most &quot;efficient&quot; for the supply chain.  The fact is that GS-1 is considerably more expensive than HIBCC.  Why?  and while that&#039;s fine for their customers, does the industry really reduce total costs by forcing HIBCC customers to convert?  Thanks to all for an honest and civil debate.  TA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dirk for a thoughtful and rational piece on this issue and a fair treatment of my concerns.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, as a business issue I don&#8217;t really have a dog in this fight as we deal with both standards families now.  I was raising the issue, as you are to promote a more critical look at &#8220;efficiency&#8221; which is not only what will be the most convenient solution, but also considers the cost to implement that option. In either case choosing a single set when two are now in widespread use will be an expensive conversion.  Is it worth it?<br />
A few other clarifications:  I think both standards are truly global so this issue is a red herring, and I don&#8217;t feel qualified to comment on the value of GS-1 &#8220;inter-industry&#8221; advantage, but I do notice when shopping retail at Barnes and Noble that books have their own standard (ISBN). I also think that cost is a big deal, and an integral part of determining what is most &#8220;efficient&#8221; for the supply chain.  The fact is that GS-1 is considerably more expensive than HIBCC.  Why?  and while that&#8217;s fine for their customers, does the industry really reduce total costs by forcing HIBCC customers to convert?  Thanks to all for an honest and civil debate.  TA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferret</title>
		<link>http://www.rxtrace.com/2010/01/why-the-rush-for-gs1-standards.html/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rxtrace.com/?p=61#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Thanks for an insightful article. 
A point of clarification, HIBCC standards are NOT only &quot;unique to the healthcare industry&quot; they are specifically for medical devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for an insightful article.<br />
A point of clarification, HIBCC standards are NOT only &#8220;unique to the healthcare industry&#8221; they are specifically for medical devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 23/28 queries in 0.118 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.rxtrace.com @ 2012-02-10 13:24:10 -->
