Noted writer, editor, literary critic and teacher, William Zinsser, is known for the quote “writing is thinking on paper”. Today I don’t think paper has much to do with it, but what I think he means is, the very process of writing something forces a person to think about the thing they are writing about, and then embody that thinking clearly in the written output (paper or electronic). As you might imagine, I agree with this. I like to write and I believe that my own experience with writing has greatly improved my thinking. For a really great essay on the topic of writing and thinking, see The Secret About Writing That No One Has The Balls To Tell You by Pete Michaud…and don’t miss the many excellent comments below his essay.
I’ve been writing about ideas surrounding my professional experience much longer than the year and a half I have been writing RxTrace. In fact, I have written some pretty legendary emails and other essays over my career. Legendary because they raised ideas that were either unpopular or otherwise not wanted by the recipient(s). If you know me very well then chances are you’ve read one or two of those.
I think there is a significant difference between the traceability repositories we see on the market today and those that I think we are likely to see in the future. Today, traceability repositories are typically implemented by software suppliers as standalone applications or modules that we end users refer to as “an EPCIS”. We call it that because the most defining characteristic of these modules is that they implement GS1’s Electronic Product Code Information Services (EPCIS) standard. Today, traceability repository vendors expect customers to buy their traceability module and integrate it with existing applications. For a long time now I have felt that this approach was less than optimal and I think we will eventually see a switch occur in the software market toward existing application vendors adding traceability repositories and EPCIS interfaces as new features added to their existing functionality. Let me explain. Continue reading The Future of Traceability Repositories and Inventory Management Systems→
I’ve been involved in a number of conversations lately that included differing opinions about what will be necessary to “certify” a drug pedigree in California after their pedigree law goes into effect (2015-2017, depending on your role in the supply chain). It’s a contentious issue, especially for those who wish that a distributed pedigree model would comply.
The California Law is fairly clear that the pedigree must contain, “A certification under penalty of perjury from a responsible party of the source of the dangerous drug that the information contained in the pedigree is true and accurate.” And that, among a list of other things, it must include “…the name and address of each person certifying delivery or receipt of the dangerous drug.”
In the U.S., the initials FOB stand for “Freight On Board”. “FOB…” is used here to establish which party, the buyer or seller, pays the shipping costs. FOB terms are typically either “FOB Shipping Point“, which means the buyer must pay the shipping, or “FOB Destination“, which means the seller must pay the shipping costs. The “FOB” terms of a given shipment of goods must be agreed to by the buyer and seller, either through a pre-negotiated contract, or through the seller’s acceptance of the terms spelled out in the buyer’s purchase order (PO).
If someone had told me even six months ago I’d be writing an essay about FOB terms I wouldn’t have believed them. It seems like the most boring topic imaginable. So what has led me to this boring topic? Have I finally run out of things to write about? Continue reading Pedigree Will Change FOB Terms→
Last Friday I attended the first annual Partnership For Safe Medicines (PSM)Interchange 2010 event. PSM is a coalition of organizations that are committed to the safety of prescription drugs and protecting consumers against unapproved, counterfeit, substandard, mishandled or otherwise unsafe medicines. PSM was started a few years ago to help educate healthcare professionals and the public about the dangers of counterfeit and other illegitimate drugs. It is based in Vienna, VA but focuses on the problem globally. The membership is made up of professional organizations from industry, universities and government.
I don’t get paid for endorsements. I don’t sell my opinion. No one has my thoughts under their control. So when I tell you that the Healthcare Distribution Management Association’s HDMA Track and Trace Seminar is my favorite pharmaceutical industry serialization and pedigree seminar every year, you should know that’s my honest opinion. This year, the event will be held on November 8-10 in National Harbor, MD (just south of Washington DC).
BTW, This opinion wasn’t solicited and I am paying full (member) price to attend the event. This isn’t an advertisement. It’s what I believe.
GS1 US is dedicated to expanding the adoption of GS1 Global’s standards for supply chain interaction in the U.S. market. Almost every country in the world has a GS1 “Member Organization” (M.O.) that is dedicated to the same thing within their borders. With the local M.O.’s primary focus on driving adoption, their most valuable tool is that country’s government. If they can get the government to reference GS1 standards in their laws, their work is much easier.
This isn’t unique to GS1, or course. All standards organizations know this and they all have various approaches to getting the attention of each country’s government. There is nothing wrong with this. In fact, it makes perfect sense since, unlike standards organizations themselves, countries always have very large enforcement wings.
DPMS has many benefits. It results in a self-contained, self-secure electronic document that clearly shows the chain of ownership and/or custody of a given drug package (or a set of packages if they all have the same history). It works equally well with serialized and non-serialized products. The security of DMPS documents comes from within the electronic documents themselves rather than just from a security layer wrapped around a given server. A self-contained, self-secure document model should work well as evidence in a criminal trial.
DISCLAIMER: RxTrace contains some of the personal thoughts, ideas and opinions of Dirk Rodgers. The material contained in RxTrace is not legal advice. Dirk Rodgers is not a lawyer. The reader must make their own decisions about the accuracy of the opinions expressed in RxTrace. Readers are encouraged to consult their own legal counsel and trading partners before taking any actions based on information found in RxTrace. RxTrace is not a vehicle for communicating the positions of any company, organization or individual other than Dirk Rodgers.