When I created RxTrace almost six years ago my goal was to introduce and explore new ideas and opinions I had about technology issues related to regulatory compliance within the pharmaceutical supply chain. (see my first essay that explains this purpose: “Welcome to rxTrace”). Hopefully my loyal readers will agree that I have accomplished exactly that, many times. Later, when I struck out on my own as an independent consultant, RxTrace also generated leads which led to new consulting engagements. It served to Continue reading The Future Of RxTrace→
GS1’s Serial Shipping Container Code, or SSCC, has been around a long time, but the logistics identifier has recently taken center-stage in a number of controversies related to meeting several country-specific pharma traceability regulations. I’ll cover these controversies in multiple essays—in this one, Brazil.
This controversy started when ANVISA, the pharma regulator in Brazil, indicated in their regulations that they expected companies to mark every “transport package” entering their supply chain with a unique identification code so that each serialized unit inside can be associated with it (the aggregation requirement).
I was more than a little disappointed when I saw that SecuringIndustry.com had beaten me in a race to publish an essay/article about the new crazy serialization and traceability requirements published last week by the government of India. That was to be my topic for next Monday. But after reading their excellent coverage—received just as I was sitting down to begin writing—I felt better. At least I had not yet started writing! Don’t miss Phil Taylor’s excellent coverage and his link to the source regulation. See if you agree how crazy it is. The deadlines are now Continue reading India’s Pharma Export Regulations Update And The NECC Story→
Well over 18 months ago I learned that Ron Bone was stepping down as SVP of Distribution Support at McKesson. He immediately became a solo consultant and was engaged directly with McKesson again, but this time he filled a part-time role. This was Ron’s way of staying connected with the activities at McKesson related to meeting the federal Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) which was on its journey toward enactment, and it was McKesson’s way of maintaining continuity in those efforts. Win-win.
Ron originally intended to fully retire last July…then December…and now, someday. Does anyone think it will happen this time? Frankly, I hope not. I think Ron is having too much fun, and everyone in the industry who knows him enjoys having Ron engaged as much as he is willing. So take your time Ron. No need to rush.
There is a not-so-secret situation that has been festering for years in the internal IT systems of many companies in the U.S. pharma supply chain. In the past, nobody liked to admit it, but most would, because the full extent of the problem was hidden away from public view. It was an internal problem mostly affecting only internal systems.
The problem was that the quality of the local master data was poor. Master data is the data that companies hold in internal databases to describe their trading partners (customers and suppliers), products (their own and those of other companies), contract parameters (pricing, authorization, terms and conditions, etc.), and facilities, etc.
…a comprehensive exploration of the intersection between healthcare supply chains, track and trace technology, standards and global regulatory compliance
DISCLAIMER: RxTrace contains some of the personal thoughts, ideas and opinions of RxTrace. The material contained in RxTrace is not legal advice. The writers of RxTrace are not lawyers. The reader must make their own decisions about the accuracy of the opinions expressed in RxTrace. Readers are encouraged to consult their own legal counsel and trading partners before taking any actions based on information found in RxTrace. RxTrace is not a vehicle for communicating the positions of any company, organization or individual other than RxTrace.